ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing the early diagnosis of neurological disorders through the application of machine learning for predictive analytics in medical imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A survey of deep learning techniques in detecting neurological disorders using MRI.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in Neurological Diseases: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Noninvasive evaluation and clinical value prediction of tumor-infiltrating neutrophil-to-T-cell ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in AI-based diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using MRI: a comprehensive survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Hybrid multimodal late fusion frameworks for bvFTD classification in imbalanced dementia datasets.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of Neurological Disorders (ND) such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Brain Tumors (BT) can be highly challenging since these diseases cause minor changes in the brain's anatomy. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a vital tool for diagnosing and visualizing these ND; however, standard techniques contingent upon human analysis can be inaccurate, require a long-time, and detect early-stage symptoms necessary for effective treatment. Spatial Feature Extraction (FE) has been improved by Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and hybrid models, both of which are changes in Deep Learning (DL). However, these analysis methods frequently fail to accept temporal dynamics, which is significant for a complete test. The present investigation introduces the STGCN-ViT, a hybrid model that integrates CNN + Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks (STGCN) + Vision Transformer (ViT) components to address these gaps. The model causes the reference to EfficientNet-B0 for FE in space, STGCN for FE in time, and ViT for FE using AM. By applying the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) and Harvard Medical School (HMS) benchmark datasets, the recommended approach proved effective in the investigations, with Group A attaining an accuracy of 93.56%, a precision of 94.41% and an Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) score of 94.63%. Compared with standard and transformer-based models, the model attains better results for Group B, with an accuracy of 94.52%, precision of 95.03%, and AUC-ROC score of 95.24%. Those results support the model's use in real-time medical applications by providing proof of the probability of accurate but early-stage ND diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.