ArticleScientific reports2025
The leisure time and occupational physical activity paradox in persistent musculoskeletal pain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mediators of the effect of chiropractic care on 12- and 52-week outcomes for U.S. active-duty military personnel with low back pain: secondary analysis of a clinical trial.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Trial
- The Effects of Occupational and Leisure Time Physical Activity on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Repeated-Measures Longitudinal Study.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Association of the 24-hour movement behaviours composition with workers' chronic musculoskeletal pain.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leisure time and occupational physical activity (LTPA, OPA) seem to have opposite associations with some health outcomes. Few studies have investigated this for musculoskeletal pain. We investigated the association between (1) LTPA and OPA, and (2) combinations thereof, and persistent pain and number of pain sites, respectively, among adults. We used cross-sectional data from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. LTPA and OPA was measured using the Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale. The outcomes were persistent pain and number of pain sites (past six months). Using hurdle models, the association between physical activity and the outcomes was expressed as odds ratios (OR) and incidence rate ratios. We included 2787 individuals. High LTPA was associated with decreased odds of persistent pain and lower number of pain sites, whereas high OPA was associated with increased odds of persistent pain and higher number of pain sites (e.g., high LTPA vs. inactive, OR: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26, 0.57; high OPA vs. sedentary work, OR: 2.94, 95% CI 1.66, 5.20). All LTPA-OPA-combinations indicated higher odds for persistent pain and higher number of pain sites when compared to moderate-to-high LTPA and sedentary work. This study highlights that not all physical activity may be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.