Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594203›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

STIED: a deep learning model for the spatiotemporal detection of focal interictal epileptiform discharges with MEG.

Raquel Fernández-Martín, Alfonso Gijón, Odile Feys, Elodie Juvené, Alec Aeby, Charline Urbain, Xavier De Tiège, Vincent Wens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raquel Fernández-MartínLaboratoire de Neuroanatomie et de Neuroimagerie Translationnelles (LN2T), ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070, Brussels, Belgium. raquelfm.pt@gmail.com.
Alfonso GijónDepartment of Mathematics, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014, Córdoba, Spain. agijon@uco.es.
Odile FeysLaboratoire de Neuroanatomie et de Neuroimagerie Translationnelles (LN2T), ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Elodie JuvenéDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Alec AebyDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Charline UrbainNeuropsychology and Functional Neuroimaging Unit (UR2NF), Center for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Xavier De TiègeLaboratoire de Neuroanatomie et de Neuroimagerie Translationnelles (LN2T), ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Vincent WensLaboratoire de Neuroanatomie et de Neuroimagerie Translationnelles (LN2T), ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) allows the non-invasive detection of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). Clinical MEG analysis in epileptic patients traditionally relies on the visual identification of IEDs, which is time consuming and partially subjective. Automatic, data-driven detection methods exist but show limited performance. Still, the rise of deep learning (DL)-with its ability to reproduce human-like abilities-could revolutionize clinical MEG practice. Here, we developed and validated STIED, a simple yet powerful supervised DL algorithm combining two convolutional neural networks with temporal (1D time-course) and spatial (2D topography) features of MEG signals inspired from current clinical guidelines. Our DL model enabled a successful identification of IEDs in patients suffering from focal epilepsy with frequent and high amplitude spikes (FE group), with high-performance metrics-accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity all exceeding 85%-when learning from spatiotemporal features of IEDs. This performance can be attributed to our handling of input data, which mimics established clinical MEG practice. Reverse engineering further revealed that STIED encodes fine spatiotemporal features of IEDs rather than their mere amplitude. The model trained on the FE group also showed promising results when applied to a separate group of presurgical patients with different types of refractory focal epilepsy, though further work is needed to distinguish IEDs from physiological transients. This proof-of-concept study represents a first step towards the use of STIED and DL algorithms in the routine clinical MEG evaluation of epilepsy.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEpilepsies, PartialMagnetoencephalographyAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerAutomatic interictal epileptiform discharges detectionConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningEpilepsyMagnetoencephalography

Identifiers

PMID40594203
PMCPMC12217781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.