ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating health literacy and sociodemographic factors in college students.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation and Assessment of Structural Validity and Internal Consistency of the Polish Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) in Health Professions Students.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Knowledge and Determinants of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Among Adults in Northern Border Region, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health literacy is a vital constituent of public health in the country. Frequently overlooked in research studies, health literacy is an important multidimensional construct essential for building a robust healthcare system across the country. Health literacy is vital for college students as it provides the necessary skills and information to make health-related decisions and better manage their health. This study aims to understand various aspects of health literacy and its correlation with sociodemographic determinants in a population of college students. The study employs a cross-sectional design with a sample size of 200 students. The health literacy of the subjects was assessed using the health literacy questionnaire (HLQ). In addition, sociodemographic information was also collected from the participants. Univariate (ANOVA) and multivariate (MANOVA) statistical methods were employed to understand how the subjects' health literacy was affected by various sociodemographic factors. Among the nine individual scales of the HLQ, the subjects in our study possess increased social support for health and the ability to diligently participate in discussions with health professionals to learn about their health. Importantly, health literacy is affected by subscription to health insurance (p = 0.0024), physical activity status (p = 0), and family income of the participants (p = 0.0001). Health insurance affected eight scales of the HLQ, physical activity affected five scales, and family income affected seven scales, with small to moderate effect sizes observed for most cases (ANOVA). We did not find any significant effects of consumption of prescription medication, year and discipline of study, the presence of chronic illness, and food preference of the subjects on health literacy, while a weak effect of gender was noticed. The study points to the existence of noticeable differences in college students' health literacy across various sociodemographic groups. By identifying disparities in various HLQ scales among different sociodemographic groups, this study paves the way for designing focused training activities for student groups with lower scores. Such curricular interventions would enable students to manage their health effectively, leading to equitable health results among the student population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.