ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of landscape ecological risk in the lower reaches of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2020.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid urban development and human activities have led to drastic changes in land use, resulting to heightened ecological pressures and risks to ecosystems, especially in cities along the lower reaches of the Yellow River (CLRYR), China. However, the landscape pattern and associated ecological risks in the CLRYR in the past twenty years remain unclear. In this study, we employed the land use data to identify the primary landscape types and their transformations, providing an in-depth analysis of the prevailing landscape pattern and the landscape ecological risk (LER) in the CLRYR. Additionally, we explored the spatial distribution of LER and investigated the underlying driving forces behind these changes. The results reveal that: (1) Cropland is the main landscape type in the CLRYR region; however, the area of cropland decreases with the transition to impervious. (2) Due to human activities, landscape fragmentation and diversity have gradually increased in CLRYR, while aggregation has gradually decreased, until there was some improvement between 2015 and 2020. (3) The LER in the CLRYR region exhibits instability, with values of 0.1761, 0.1751, 0.1760, 0.1773, and 0.1751 displaying a fluctuating downward trend. Directional distribution analysis indicates a movement of the LER center of gravity towards the mouth of the Yellow River, accompanied by an increasing dispersion pattern. Analysis of driving forces suggests that natural factors hold greater explanatory power compared to social factors. Moreover, interaction detection results reveal that the combined effect of any two factors surpasses that of a single factor. The findings offer a theoretical foundation for enhancing planning policies aimed at striking a balance between environmental preservation and social advancement within the CLRYR region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.