Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594143›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Anticipatory and reactive mechanisms of habituation to visual distractors.

Bram Burleson, Massimo Turatto, Gijs Plomp, David Pascucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bram BurlesonDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medecine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. bram.burleson@unige.ch.
Massimo TurattoCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Gijs PlompPerceptual Networks Group, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
David PascucciPerceptual Networks Group, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation PP00P1_183714Swiss National Science Foundation PZ00P1_179988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human attention can rapidly habituate to irrelevant and repetitive visual distractors. Although this phenomenon is well-documented in behavioral studies, the neural mechanisms involved remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the neural correlates of attentional habituation using scalp electroencephalography (EEG). Participants performed a visual discrimination task while intermittently presented with salient distractor stimuli. The cost in reaction times (RT) associated with the distractor exhibited the typical time course of habituation, decreasing as a function of repeated exposure to the distractor. We found that this habituation coincided with both reactive and proactive changes in EEG activity. Post-distractor reactive EEG components emerged gradually over the course of the experiment, likely reflecting the operation of an inhibitory network aimed at suppressing distractor interference in the main task. Pre-stimulus α rhythms gradually tuned their power peaks to the anticipated moment of the distractor, suggesting the involvement of predictive inhibitory models based on prior experience with the distractor. Collectively, our findings suggest that attentional habituation involves multi-stage interacting mechanisms that anticipate the occurrence of a distractor and facilitate the rapid reallocation of attentional resources away from the distractor.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalAttentionHabituation, PsychophysiologicVisual PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung AdultAlpha rhythmsAttentionDistractorsEEGHabituation

Identifiers

PMID40594143
PMCPMC12218333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.