ArticleScientific reports2025
Anticipatory and reactive mechanisms of habituation to visual distractors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stimulus Size Modulates Periodic and Aperiodic EEG Components in SSVEP-Based BCIs.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- The dual impact of irrelevant visual onsets: Habituation of capture unlocks onset facilitation.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human attention can rapidly habituate to irrelevant and repetitive visual distractors. Although this phenomenon is well-documented in behavioral studies, the neural mechanisms involved remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the neural correlates of attentional habituation using scalp electroencephalography (EEG). Participants performed a visual discrimination task while intermittently presented with salient distractor stimuli. The cost in reaction times (RT) associated with the distractor exhibited the typical time course of habituation, decreasing as a function of repeated exposure to the distractor. We found that this habituation coincided with both reactive and proactive changes in EEG activity. Post-distractor reactive EEG components emerged gradually over the course of the experiment, likely reflecting the operation of an inhibitory network aimed at suppressing distractor interference in the main task. Pre-stimulus α rhythms gradually tuned their power peaks to the anticipated moment of the distractor, suggesting the involvement of predictive inhibitory models based on prior experience with the distractor. Collectively, our findings suggest that attentional habituation involves multi-stage interacting mechanisms that anticipate the occurrence of a distractor and facilitate the rapid reallocation of attentional resources away from the distractor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.