Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594131›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mapping mangrove multi-trait functional diversity from satellite observations across dense and fragmented stands using spectral-biophysical derivatives.

Nguyen An Binh, Leon T Hauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nguyen An BinhDepartment of Geography and Remote Sensing, Institute of Life Sciences, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Leon T HauserDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland. leon.hauser@geo.uzh.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupying critical ecological areas at the land-sea interface, mangrove ecosystems are increasingly recognized as potent nature-based solutions supporting diverse sustainable development goals. Leveraging spatially explicit remote sensing for monitoring mangrove biodiversity is essential, however, measurement challenges arise due to their narrow and fragmented distribution over impenetrable muddy substrates compared to terrestrial forests. This study presents the first attempt to map mangrove functional diversity (FD) using a multi-trait-based approach, incorporating key spectral vegetation indexes as well as optically derived functional traits: leaf chlorophyll content (LCC), leaf mass per area (LMA), and equivalent water thickness (EWT) retrieved from Sentinel-2. A moving window approach was employed to quantify three independent FD components: richness, divergence, and evenness. While spatial scale dependence primarily influenced richness, the moving window size significantly impacted spatial FD results, especially in fragmented mangrove areas. Both ecological relevance and independence of selected traits/VIs dominated the construction of more ecologically representative niches in computational three-dimensional space, leading to different estimations of mangrove FD based on input correlations. This study advances remote sensing applications for quantifying mangrove FD, meanwhile highlighting challenges of scaling, fragmentation, and input selection for providing valuable biodiversity insights into mangrove blue carbon ecosystems.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySatellite ImageryWetlandsChlorophyllEcosystemPlant LeavesRemote Sensing TechnologyChlorophyll

Identifiers

PMID40594131
PMCPMC12214841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.