ArticleScientific reports2025
Management and prediction of river flood utilizing optimization approach of artificial intelligence evolutionary algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable artificial intelligence for sedimentary facies segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flooding is a devastating natural disaster that causes fatalities and property damage worldwide. Effective flood susceptibility mapping (FSM) has become crucial for mitigating flood risks, especially in urban areas. This study evaluates the performance of artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms for FSM using machine learning classification. Traditional flood prediction models face limitations due to data complexity and computational constraints. This research incorporates artificial intelligence, particularly evolutionary algorithms, to create more adaptable and robust flood prediction models. Four specific algorithms-black hole algorithm (BHA), future search algorithm (FSA), heap-based optimization (HBO), and multiverse optimization (MVO)-were tested for predicting flood occurrences in the Fars region of Iran. These evolutionary algorithms simulate natural processes like selection, mutation, and crossover to optimize flood predictions and management strategies, improving adaptability in dynamic environments. The novelty of this study lies in using evolutionary AI algorithms to not only predict floods more accurately but also optimize flood management strategies. The ANN was trained with geographical data on eight flood-impacting factors, including elevation, rainfall, slope, NDVI, aspect, geology, land use, and river data. The models were validated with historical flood damage data from the Fars area using metrics like mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results showed significant improvements in accuracy for BHA-MLP, FSA-MLP, MVO-MLP, and HBO-MLP, with accuracy indices and AUC values increasing. The study concludes that hybridized models offer an effective and economically viable approach for urban flood vulnerability mapping, providing valuable insights for flood preparedness and emergency response strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.