Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594117›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative study of five-year cervical cancer cause-specific survival prediction models based on SEER data.

Yuping Pu, Jundong Liu, Kei Hang Katie Chan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuping PuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jundong LiuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kei Hang Katie ChanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China. kkhchan@cityu.edu.hk.

Funding

City University of Hong Kong 9610401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) is a major cause of mortality in women, with stagnant survival rates, highlighting the need for improved prognostic models. This study aims to develop and compare machine learning models for predicting five-year cause-specific survival (CSS) in CC patients and evaluate their performance against traditional methods like the Cox Proportional Hazards model. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, we applied the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique to address class imbalance and used stepwise forward selection, feature importance, and permutation importance for feature selection. The Gradient Boosting Survival Analysis (GBSA) model outperformed others with an Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighted Concordance Index of 0.835 and an Integrated Brier Score of 0.120. SHAP value analysis identified tumor stage and surgical resection as key factors. These findings address a critical gap in CSS prediction for CC patients and offer insights for clinical decision-making and personalized treatment. The GBSA model provides more accurate survival predictions, aiding clinicians in tailoring treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes. However, the retrospective study design, potential SEER data entry errors, and the lack of genetic markers and detailed treatment protocols should be considered when interpreting the results.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramSurvival AnalysisSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID40594117
PMCPMC12216411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.