Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594110›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluating the temperature profile and pressure drops in gas-lift wells via coupled temperature-pressure analysis.

Derong Jing, Jie Wang, Chengyu Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Derong JingSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Jie WangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China. wj_submission@163.com.
Chengyu XiaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gas-lift technique is a widely implemented artificial lifting method that has been optimized through operational parameter adjustments and structural improvements. While accurately predicting the pressure drop and temperature distribution in the wellbore is critical for improving this process. However, current research on temperature-pressure coupling in gas-lift wellbores remains limited. This paper presents a comprehensive temperature-pressure coupled analysis to evaluate the temperature distribution and pressure drops in gas-lift wells. This study incorporates key factors such as gas injection temperature and volume, tubing diameter, and crude oil production into a fully coupled model that accounts for gas-water-oil three-phase flow regime within the tubing. By resolving the coupled heat transfer and hydrodynamic equations, the model accurately predicts liquid flow regimes and pressure drops under varying process parameters. The model was validated using data from published literature, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the model's reliability and to identify critical parameters influencing temperature and pressure distributions. These findings provide theoretical guidance for the design and operation of gas-lift wells, enhance gas-lift efficiency, and offer significant practical implications for optimizing gas injection strategies and improving production rates in complex reservoirs.

Indexed as

Coupled modelGas-lift wellsPressure dropsSensitivity analysisTemperature field

Identifiers

PMID40594110
PMCPMC12219403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.