ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of Glyoxal fixation for immunohistochemistry of the retina.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Could glyoxal be an alternative fixative to paraformaldehyde in human spermatozoa?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Fixation matters: duration in fixative prior to immunofluorescent analysis directly impacts macrophage visualization in epithelial tissues.Discovery immunology · 2026Article
- Improvement and development of immersion fixatives for enhanced tissue preservation in the whole eyeball specimens.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry has become an essential tool in retinal research. Formaldehyde is the gold standard fixative, but the development of an improved fixative is of keen interest. Herein, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of the compatibility of glyoxal fixation with retinal immunohistochemistry, using wholemounts, cryosections and paraffin-embedded eyes. Immunohistochemistry was performed in normal rat eyes, and, to facilitate localisation of stress-response proteins, eyes subjected to laser-induced retinal injury or injected with the endotoxin lipopolysaccharide. Regarding wholemounts, glyoxal fixation produced retinas that were too fragile to be consistently dissected as pristine wholemounts. In terms of antigenicity, we observed no consistent improvement when glyoxal fixation was used. Some antibodies produced higher signal intensities, but a greater number displayed weaker signal-to-background patterns of labelling compared to formaldehyde fixation. For cryosections and paraffin sections, we likewise found no compelling evidence that immunohistochemical signals were intensified when formaldehyde was replaced by glyoxal. For the 50 antibodies tested, formaldehyde typically produced signal-to-background immunolabelling that was equivalent or superior to glyoxal. In conclusion, the results of this study do not support the use of glyoxal fixation for immunohistochemistry of the rat retina, but with the caveat that improved formulations and protocols may address the limitations exposed herein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.