ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel approach to overcome black box of AI for optical diagnosis in colonoscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-derived bone mineral density from standard radiographs compared with DXA for fracture prediction in a 10-year real-world cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Ethical and Legal Implications of Implementing AI in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate real-time optical diagnosis that distinguishes neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions during colonoscopy can lower the costs of pathological assessments, prevent unnecessary polypectomies, and help avoid adverse events. Using a multistep process, this study developed an explainable artificial intelligence method, niceAI, for classifying hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps. Radiomics and color were extracted, followed by feature selection with deep learning features using Spearman's correlation analysis. The selected deep features were merged with the narrow-band imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic grading, aligning with endoscopists' decision-making process to produce an interpretable diagnostic output. Initially, 2,048 deep features were identified; these were reduced to 103 in the second screening, and finally to 14. Similarly, 24 radiomics features were selected, whereas no color features were chosen. Comparative evaluation showed that niceAI had accuracy comparable to that of deep learning models (area under the curve, 0.946; accuracy, 0.883; sensitivity, 0.888; specificity, 0.879; positive predictive value, 0.893; negative predictive value, 0.872). This study introduces a novel system that combines radiomics and deep features to enhance the transparency and understanding of optical diagnosis. This approach bridges the gap between artificial intelligence predictions and clinically meaningful assessments, thereby offering a practical solution for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.