ArticleScientific reports2025
Surgical timing and approach for brainstem cavernous malformation warranting thorough preoperative evaluation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pure endoscopic resection of brainstem cavernous malformations: a systematic review of current evidence and future directions.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical course and surgical outcomes of cerebral cavernous malformations: Insights from a large single-center experience.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Management for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: A Study Involving 100 Cases.Cureus · 2025Article
- Safe reoperation for a newly developed brainstem cavernoma in a different region after prior resection.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemorrhage from brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs) can cause severe neurological dysfunction. While surgery is effective, the optimal timing remains unclear. This retrospective study aims to identify the best timing for surgery after hemorrhage in BSCM patients. Data from patients who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2022 were analyzed. Patients were divided into groups with favorable and unfavorable outcomes based on their best post-treatment modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. They were further categorized into four groups according to the timing of surgery after hemorrhage: hyperacute (≤ 7 days), acute (8-20 days), subacute (21-56 days), and chronic (> 56 days). Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, prognosis, and outcomes were compared between the groups. A total of 135 BSCM patients were included, with most lesions located in the pons. Surgical timing distribution was as follows: hyperacute phase (12 cases), acute phase (42 cases), subacute phase (69 cases), and chronic phase (12 cases). Of these, 113 patients had favorable outcomes. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in mRS scores between the four groups, with the most pronounced differences observed between the acute/subacute phases and the hyperacute/chronic phases. In conclusion, performing surgery in the acute and subacute phases could improve neurological function in BSCM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.