ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of internal flow field characteristics in the nozzle of the three-phase jet fire monitor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a critical component of the three-phase jet fire monitor head, the nozzle efficiently converts fluid pressure energy into kinetic energy. Optimizing its structural parameters is essential for enhancing jet performance and firefighting efficiency. This study investigates the internal flow field of the nozzle using the VOF method, examining the influence of various structural parameters. The research systematically examines the effects of the nozzle outer wall contraction angle, powder nozzle expansion angle, and length of the nozzle straight section on the internal flow field characteristics. Results indicate that when the nozzle outer wall contraction angle exceeds 25°, the velocity uniformity at the nozzle outlet deteriorates significantly, average turbulent kinetic energy at the outlet of the nozzle increases to 2.37 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.