Observational studyScientific reports2025
A prospective study on incidence of desaturations in ERCP with non-anesthesiologist sedation and adverse event awareness of endoscopists.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Sedation-related complications during ERCP in liver transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Anaesthetic Adverse Events During Propofol-Based Sedation for ERCP: A Real-World Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Entropy-Guided Sedation Is Associated with Improved Hemodynamic Stability and Recovery During ERCP: A Prospective Real-World Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Respiratory safety and resource utilization in ERCP: a comparative study of high-flow nasal oxygen, conventional mask, and general anesthesia in high-risk populations.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- New Trends in Airway Management During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Little is known of the desaturation rate among NAPS (non-anesthesiological/nurse-administered propofol-sedation) ERCPs (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and endoscopists` awareness of overall incidence of adverse events (AEs). The primary aims were to assess desaturation rates and endoscopists` AE-awareness. In this prospective observation study, all ERCPs performed in a certain period were included. Nurses documented hypoxemia and measures taken to correct it. Charts were reviewed for clinical data. Definitions of AEs were based on the 2020 ESGE guidelines. Of 232 included ERCPs, 218 (94%) were conducted using NAPS. Mean age was 67.9 (SD 15.8) years, 53.2% were female, median ASA status was 2 (IQR 2;3). Most (86.8%) procedures were started on 2 L O2 flow/min (via nasal cannula), propofol mono-sedation was used in 98.2%. A desaturation occurred in 22.6% (n = 45) of procedures, and 28.1% (n = 56), when including interventions performed for hypoxemia. Risk factors for desaturations were higher BMI, and higher ASA status (p < 0.05). Documentation of AEs by endoscopists was exceptionally low. Only 22.2% of post-ERCP pancreatitis, 19% of intraprocedural bleeding, 20% of desaturations were officially recorded/documented. All-cause 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the desaturation group (10.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.03). Sedation-AEs are common and desaturation is statistically significantly associated with 30-day-mortality. Incidence of complications is underappreciated by endoscopists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.