ArticleScientific data2025
PW-BALFC, a clinical dataset for detection and instance segmentation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SARS-CoV-2 drives upregulation of EpCAM in respiratory epithelial cells with hypercellular profile during severe COVID-19.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- MurineCyto-Det: A High-Resolution Murine BALF Cytology Dataset for Leukocyte Segmentation and Detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cytology provides an important basis for the diagnosis and treatment of lung diseases. Current cytological analysis of BALF relies on manual microscopic examination, which is time-consuming, laborious, and experience-dependent. Automated identification of BALF cytology helps increase the accuracy and speed of screening qualified samples and subsequent cytomorphology analysis. However, there is a lack of public clinical BALF cell datasets for the detection of different cell types and a lack of pixel-level annotations for cytomorphology analysis. In this work, high-resolution cell images from clinical bronchoalveolar lavage sample obtained at the Chinese PLA General Hospital from 2018-2024 were collected, and pixel-level high-quality instance annotations of seven cell types were labeled. In total, 2,105 clinical images were gathered, with 13,263 cells from seven distinct classes, via both contour fine labeling and bounding box labeling. The dataset was trained and tested by the YOLOv8 instance segmentation network. The results demonstrated that the dataset and model we provided are beneficial for the study of automated cell identification in BALF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.