ArticleScientific reports2025
Environmental DNA analysis at multiple taxonomic levels highlights geographic variation in subtropical coastal marine communities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, environmental DNA was used to assess marine diversity across the southern part of Okinawa Island, Japan, located in the subtropics. Diversity analysis was performed for prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Differences in diversity were detected between the west side of Okinawa (an area exposed to groundwater influenced by land-derived loads) and the east side (an area where coral reefs, beaches, and seagrass beds coexist). In particular, the community composition of prokaryotes, for which 16S rRNA metabarcoding analysis was performed, differed markedly between the east and west sides of the island. Differences in the composition of eukaryotic communities between the east and west coasts are relatively unclear, likely due to the fact that 18S rRNA metabarcoding targets a wide range of species (including almost all eukaryotic taxonomic groups), making it difficult to identify differences. On the other hand, MiFish analysis indicated that distributions of various fish species differed markedly between the east and west coasts of the island, suggesting a close relationship between differences in the coastal environment and the habitat selection by fish. We show that prokaryotic communities can be evaluated using eDNA analysis in order to monitor extensive geographic environments via water cycles. This can then be used to promote understanding of geographic variations of marine community structures of eukaryotes, including fish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.