Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594039›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning prediction and explainability analysis of high strength glass powder concrete using SHAP PDP and ICE.

Muhammad Sarmad Mahmood, Tariq Ali, Inamullah Inam, Muhammad Zeeshan Qureshi, Syed Salman Ahmad Zaidi, Muwaffaq Alqurashi, Hawreen Ahmed, Muhammad Adnan, Abdul Hakim Hotak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammad Sarmad MahmoodDepartment of Civil Engineering, Swedish College of Engineering and Technology, Wah Cantt, 47080, Pakistan.
Tariq AliDepartment of Civil Engineering, Swedish College of Engineering and Technology, Wah Cantt, 47080, Pakistan.
Inamullah InamDepartment of Civil Engineering, Laghman University, Mehtarlam, Afghanistan. inam.azizi@gmail.com.
Muhammad Zeeshan QureshiDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan. qureshizeeshan746@gmail.com.
Syed Salman Ahmad ZaidiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Wah Engineering College, University of Wah, Wah Cantt, 47040, Pakistan.
Muwaffaq AlqurashiDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Hawreen AhmedDepartment of Highway and Bridge Engineering, Technical Engineering College, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, 44001, Iraq.
Muhammad AdnanDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan.
Abdul Hakim HotakSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving high-strength concrete (HSC) with sustainable supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) remains a significant challenge in the construction industry. Although glass powder has shown promise as a partial cement substitute, its specific impact on HSC growth is still unclear. This study aims to evaluate the compressive strength (CS) of high strength glass-powder concrete (HSGPC) using machine learning (ML) models and enhance predictive accuracy through hybrid optimization techniques. A dataset comprising 598 points was compiled, considering cement, glass powder, aggregates, water, superplasticizer, and curing days as key input parameters. Three standalone ML models-K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB)-were trained, with RF achieving R² = 0.963 and XGB achieving R² = 0.946 on the test set. To further enhance performance, XGB was optimized using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Firefly Algorithm (FA), and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). Among these, XGB-GWO demonstrated the highest accuracy, with R² improving to 0.991 and MSE decreasing significantly from 83.95 to 14.42, resulting in an 82.82% error reduction. SHAP, PDP, and ICE analyses identified superplasticizer dosage, curing days, and coarse aggregate as the most influential parameters affecting compressive strength (CS). PDP and ICE validated these findings, showing reduced strength gains beyond 600 kg/m³ of cement and a decline beyond 800 kg/m³ of coarse aggregate. This study highlights the potential of ML-driven optimization for sustainable concrete design, offering an efficient, data-driven approach to optimizing material proportions for high-strength, eco-friendly concrete.

Indexed as

Glass powder concreteHigh-strength concreteHybrid optimizationMachine learningSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID40594039
PMCPMC12219312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.