Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594036›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

CareAssist GPT improves patient user experience with a patient centered approach to computer aided diagnosis.

Ali Algarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ali AlgarniDepartment of Informatics and Computer Systems, King Khalid University, 62527, Abha City, Saudi Arabia. akafeer@kku.edu.sa.

Funding

Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University RGP1/369/45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has enhanced diagnostic accuracy; however, patient engagement and satisfaction remain significant challenges that hinder the widespread acceptance and effectiveness of AI-driven clinical tools. This study introduces CareAssist-GPT, a novel AI-assisted diagnostic model designed to improve both diagnostic accuracy and the patient experience through real-time, understandable, and empathetic communication. CareAssist-GPT combines high-resolution X-ray images, real-time physiological vital signs, and clinical notes within a unified predictive framework using deep learning. Feature extraction is performed using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), gated recurrent units (GRUs), and transformer-based NLP modules. Model performance was evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and response time, alongside patient satisfaction through a structured user feedback survey. CareAssist-GPT achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 95.8%, improving by 2.4% over conventional models. It reported high precision (94.3%), recall (93.8%), and specificity (92.7%), with an AUC-ROC of 0.97. The system responded within 500 ms-23.1% faster than existing tools-and achieved a patient satisfaction score of 9.3 out of 10, demonstrating its real-time usability and communicative effectiveness. CareAssist-GPT significantly enhances the diagnostic process by improving accuracy and fostering patient trust through transparent, real-time explanations. These findings position it as a promising patient-centered AI solution capable of transforming healthcare delivery by bridging the gap between advanced diagnostics and human-centered communication.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionAI in healthcareAUC-ROCCareAssist-GPTDeep learningDiagnostic accuracyInterpretabilityMultimodal diagnosticsPatient-centered carePatient SatisfactionReal-time healthcare applications

Identifiers

PMID40594036
PMCPMC12217953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.