Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594017›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Experimental analysis of sequential water alternating CO₂ gas injection for enhancing oil recovery in X-field sandstone reservoir of Cambay basin.

Ashutosh Rawat, Bhaskarjyoti Khanikar, Abhishek Kumar Samanta, Patrick Nguessan, Bhavesh Mehta, Anirbid Sircar, Bhawanisingh Desai, Achinta Bera, Namrata Bist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Research and Development of a COGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ashutosh RawatOil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Mumbai, 400051, India.
Bhaskarjyoti KhanikarDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, School of Energy Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, 382426, India.
Abhishek Kumar SamantaDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, School of Energy Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, 382426, India.
Patrick NguessanDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, School of Energy Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, 382426, India.
Bhavesh MehtaDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, School of Energy Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, 382426, India.
Anirbid SircarDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, School of Energy Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, 382426, India.
Bhawanisingh DesaiDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, School of Energy Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, 382426, India.
Achinta BeraDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, School of Energy Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, 382426, India.
Namrata BistDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, School of Energy Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, 382426, India. Namrata.Bist@spt.pdpu.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the oil recovery potential of sandstone reservoirs through sequential water-alternating CO₂ gas injection. Experimental work focuses on optimizing injection patterns, including alternating CO₂ and water cycles, to assess their impact on enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Analytical methods performed before detailed analyses include Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD) on the crude oil and core samples from the same field of Cambay Basin. FTIR analysis revealed a dominance of long-chain aliphatic hydrocarbons, suggesting favorable interactions with CO₂ for viscosity reduction and oil swelling. XRD revealed quartz-dominant cores with subordinate feldspar that control fluid permeability and chemical interactiveness. Sequential Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) injection improved sweep efficiency by minimizing gas channeling and maximizing CO₂-oil contact. Soak periods conducted during injection enhance some miscibility effects with addition of extra oil mobility. High permeability cores experienced early gas breakthroughs, while low permeability delayed gas movement, achieving better recovery. Reservoir heterogeneities and water-shielding effects were critical challenges, underscoring the role of petrophysical properties in recovery performance. The results demonstrate that CO₂ WAG injection in sandstone reservoirs significantly enhances crude oil recovery by improving oil displacement efficiency. The presented work emphasizes the parameters porosity, permeability, and oil saturation as prerequisites for the process. Collected sandstone core samples show that variations in these properties influence the effectiveness of CO₂ WAG injection showing the resultant oil recovery increase by 20-25% after secondary brine injection. The integration of advanced characterization and strategic injection patterns establishes a foundation for optimizing CO

Indexed as

CO₂ floodingGas channelingOil recovery factorSweep efficiencyWAG injection

Identifiers

PMID40594017
PMCPMC12215586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.