Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594011›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Social and demographic determinants of Nordic Walking practice models.

Wioletta Szymczak, Krzysztof Jurek, Monika Dobrogowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wioletta SzymczakThe John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Krzysztof JurekThe John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. krzysztofjurek.kul@gmail.com.
Monika DobrogowskaThe John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article is devoted to the sociological exploration of the social phenomenon that Nordic Walking has become in Europe and worldwide over the recent decades. The purpose of the study was to develop models of Nordic walking, relating to the motivating factors, dominant elements and functions of this activity. In addition, the socio-demographic determinants of the developed models are indicated. The study included 416 Poles, 132 Europeans from 11 countries (Germany, the UK, Spain, France, Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Denmark, Austria, Sweden, and Norway), and 212 participants from 5 non-European countries (the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan). We have distinguished four models of Nordic Walking, relating to selected core elements in the analysis of social action and social participation: personal development and self-realization; health and fitness; satisfaction and well-being; ties and community. Each of them is a combination of motives, key elements considered by respondents as dominant in the experience of practicing Nordic Walking, and the functions the activity performs. At the same time, each of the models is constituted by a specific set of factors showing what socio-demographic characteristics are associated with the orientation to particular arrangements of leading elements. Our survey provides valuable information on the areas where the content and functions of the sport are located. The knowledge obtained can form the basis for designing health policies and preventive measures. It can also be useful for animators and organizers of local initiatives when creating health, activation or integration offers tailored to the needs of different age groups.

Indexed as

WalkingAdultAgedDemographyEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivation

Identifiers

PMID40594011
PMCPMC12218975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.