ArticleScientific reports2025
Novel control strategies for electric vehicle charging stations using stochastic modeling and queueing analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lightweight machine learning framework using temporal features for electric vehicle demand response forecasting on edge devices.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A scalable cloud-integrated AI platform for real-time optimization of EV charging and resilient microgrid energy management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive analytical framework for modeling electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructures through a stochastic queueing-theoretic approach that explicitly incorporates critical customer behavioral dynamics. The proposed model addresses key phenomena often overlooked in classical frameworks, including customer impatience (reneging), balking behavior, feedback mechanisms, and state-dependent service threshold policies, within a finite-population, multiple-server environment. These behavioral elements reflect realistic operational scenarios in which users may opt not to join extended queues, abandon the system due to excessive delays, or return for service completion based on prior dissatisfaction. The system dynamics are formulated using a continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC), and the corresponding Chapman-Kolmogorov differential equations are derived to characterize state transitions. Employing a matrix-analytic solution technique, the steady-state probability distribution is obtained, enabling the computation of multiple performance metrics such as system occupancy, server utilization, abandonment rates, and throughput. Numerical simulations validate the model's applicability and highlight intricate interdependencies among customer tolerance thresholds, service quality levels, and operational performance indicators. The findings offer valuable insights into capacity planning, congestion control, and service optimization, providing a rigorous decision-support framework for the design and management of EV charging networks under uncertain and dynamic user behavior. The study also outlines practical managerial implications and suggests directions for future research to enhance the adaptability and efficiency of smart charging infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.