ArticleScientific reports2025
CLASEG: advanced multiclassification and segmentation for differential diagnosis of oral lesions using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A self-supervised pre-training method for lesion segmentation in oral potentially malignant disorders.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Explainable vision transformer framework for multi-class classification and prognostic interpretation of oral cancer in histopathology images.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oral cancer has a high mortality rate primarily due to delayed diagnoses, highlighting the need for early detection of oral lesions. This study presents a novel deep learning framework for multi-class classification-based segmentation, enabling accurate differential diagnosis of 14 common oral lesions-benign, pre-malignant, and malignant-across various mouth locations using photographic images. A dataset of 2,072 clinical images was used to train and validate the model. The proposed framework integrates EfficientNet-B3 for classification and ResNet-101-based Mask R-CNN for segmentation, achieving a classification accuracy of 74.49% and segmentation performance with an average precision (AP50) of 72.18. The gradient-weighted class activation map technique was applied to the model outputs to enable visualization of the specific areas that were most influential for predictive decisions made by the model. This significantly improves upon the state-of-the-art, where previous models achieved lower segmentation accuracy (AP50 < 50%). The framework not only classifies the lesion type but also delineates the lesion boundaries with high precision, which is critical for early detection and differential diagnosis in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.