ArticleScientific reports2025
The effects of candidate probiotic strains on the gut environment in dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis mouse.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Gut-Adipose-Tumor Axis in Obesity-Related Cancer.Nutrients · 2026Review
- A Developmental Perspective on the Intestinal Microbiota in Crohn's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Recent advances in the positive role ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition characterized by intestinal inflammation and dysbiosis, with limited treatment options and significant challenges in long-term management. This study investigated the therapeutic potential of novel strains belonging to Bifidobacterium longum and Limosilactobacillus species, in a dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced mouse model of colitis. In this study, our primary objective was to determine whether ingestion of these strains alleviates colitis symptoms and, if so, to elucidate how they restored gut microbial balance and modulated microbial metabolic functions. In most probiotic-treated groups, colitis disease activity index scores were significantly improved and colon length was preserved, with strains CBA7106 and BBH exhibiting efficacy comparable to that of the Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (used as a positive control). Moreover, histological analyses confirmed reduced inflammation and enhanced mucosal integrity. Microbial diversity assessments demonstrated a marked restoration of gut microbial composition, highlighted by increased abundances of beneficial taxa such as Lactobacillus and Akkermansia. Metabolomic profiling identified key anti-inflammatory metabolites, including 6-hydroxycaproic acid, indole-3-lactic acid, and choline, which were significantly elevated in the probiotic-treated groups. Notably, functional analyses using PICRUSt2 revealed a sustained decrease in the siderophore biosynthesis pathway (ko01053), suggesting that these candidate probiotic strains may inhibit siderophore production-a pivotal mechanism by which pathogenic bacteria aggravate intestinal inflammation. Taken together, these findings indicate that the candidate probiotic strains CBA7106 and BBH effectively mitigate DSS-induced colitis by modulating the gut microbiota, promoting the production of anti-inflammatory metabolites, and suppressing siderophore biosynthesis. This study provides valuable insights into the development of targeted probiotic therapies for IBD, underscoring their potential as a complementary approach to restoring intestinal health and reducing inflammation. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these observations in human populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.