Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593969›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhanced security for medical images using a new 5D hyper chaotic map and deep learning based segmentation.

S Subathra, V Thanikaiselvan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S SubathraSchool of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India, 632014.
V ThanikaiselvanSchool of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India, 632014. thanikaiselvan@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image encryption is important for maintaining the confidentiality of sensitive medical data and protecting patient privacy. Contemporary healthcare systems store significant patient data in text and graphic form. This research proposes a New 5D hyperchaotic system combined with a customised U-Net architecture. Chaotic maps have become an increasingly popular method for encryption because of their remarkable characteristics, including statistical randomness and sensitivity to initial conditions. The significant region is segmented from the medical images using the U-Net network, and its statistics are utilised as initial conditions to generate the new random sequence. Initially, zig-zag scrambling confuses the pixel position of a medical image and applies further permutation with a new 5D hyperchaotic sequence. Two stages of diffusion are used, such as dynamic DNA flip and dynamic DNA XOR, to enhance the encryption algorithm's security against various attacks. The randomness of the New 5D hyperchaotic system is verified using the NIST SP800-22 statistical test, calculating the Lyapunov exponent and plotting the attractor diagram of the chaotic sequence. The algorithm validates with statistical measures such as PSNR, MSE, NPCR, UACI, entropy, and Chi-square values. Evaluation is performed for test images yields average horizontal, vertical, and diagonal correlation coefficients of -0.0018, -0.0002, and 0.0007, respectively, Shannon entropy of 7.9971, Kolmogorov Entropy value of 2.9469, NPCR of 99.61%, UACI of 33.49%, Chi-square "PASS" at both the 5% (293.2478) and 1% (310.4574) significance levels, key space is 2

Indexed as

Computer SecurityDeep LearningDiagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsConfidentialityHumansCritical region segmentationDynamic DNA encodingHyper-chaotic mapImage encryptionU-NetZig-zag scrambling

Identifiers

PMID40593969
PMCPMC12215922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.