Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593923›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

GenAI exceeds clinical experts in predicting acute kidney injury following paediatric cardiopulmonary bypass.

Mansour Sharabiani, Alireza Mahani, Alex Bottle, Yadav Srinivasan, Richard Issitt, Serban Stoica

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mansour SharabianiSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. mt5605@imperial.ac.uk.
Alireza MahaniNew York Stock Exchange, New York, United States. alireza.s.mahani@gmail.com.
Alex BottleSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Yadav SrinivasanGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Richard IssittGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Serban StoicaBristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) opens new horizons to leverage, often unused, information in clinical text. Our study aims to capitalise on this new potential. Specifically, we examine the utility of text embeddings generated by LLMs in predicting postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in paediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) patients using electronic health record (EHR) text, and propose methods for explaining their output. AKI could be a serious complication in paediatric CPB and its accurate prediction can significantly improve patient outcomes by enabling timely interventions. We evaluate various text embedding algorithms such as Doc2Vec, top-performing sentence transformers on Hugging Face, and commercial LLMs from Google and OpenAI. We benchmark the cross-validated performance of these 'AI models' against a 'baseline model' as well as an established clinically-defined 'expert model'. The baseline model includes structured features, i.e., patient gender, age, height, body mass index and length of operation. The majority of AI models surpass, not only the baseline model, but also the expert model. An ensemble of AI and clinical-expert models improves discriminative performance by 23% compared to the baseline model. Consistency of patient clusters formed from AI-generated embeddings with clinical-expert clusters-measured via the adjusted rand index and adjusted mutual information metrics-illustrates the medical validity of LLM embeddings. We create a reverse mapping from the numeric embedding space to the natural-language domain via the embedding-based clusters, generating medical labels for the clusters in the process. We also use text-generating LLMs to summarise the differences between AI and expert clusters. Such 'explainability' outputs can increase medical practitioners' trust in the AI applications, and help generate new hypotheses, e.g., by studying the association of cluster memberships and outcomes of interest.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCardiopulmonary BypassPostoperative ComplicationsAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInfantMaleAcute kidney injuryCardiopulmonary bypassElectronic health recordsGenerative artificial intelligenceSpherical k-meansText embedding

Identifiers

PMID40593923
PMCPMC12216426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.