Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593918›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Quality assessment of large language models' output in maternal health.

Henrique A Lima, Pedro H F S Trocoli-Couto, Zorays Moazzam, Leonardo C D Rocha, Adriana Pagano, Felipe F Martins, Lucas T Brabo, Zilma S N Reis, Lisa Keder, Aliya Begum and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prompt injection of OpenAI custom GPTs leaks informatics secrets.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Henrique A LimaFederal University of Minas Gerais Faculty of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Pedro H F S Trocoli-CoutoFederal University of Minas Gerais Faculty of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Zorays MoazzamHenry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Leonardo C D RochaFederal University of São João Del-Rei Computer Science Department, São João Del-Rei, Brazil.
Adriana PaganoFederal University of Minas Gerais Arts Faculty, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Felipe F MartinsAsenion, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Lucas T BraboAsenion, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Zilma S N ReisFederal University of Minas Gerais Faculty of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Lisa KederDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Aliya BegumDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Marcelo H MamedeFederal University of Minas Gerais Faculty of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Vivian ResendeFederal University of Minas Gerais Faculty of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. vivianresende.ufmg@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4400-0427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimising healthcare is linked to broadening access to health literacy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. The safe and responsible deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) may provide accurate, reliable, and culturally relevant healthcare information. We aimed to assess the quality of outputs generated by LLMs addressing maternal health. We employed GPT-4, GPT-3.5, GPT-3.5 custom, Meditron-70b. Using mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey approach, specialists from Brazil, United States, and Pakistan assessed LLM-generated responses in their native languages to a set of three questions relating to maternal health. Evaluators assessed the answers in technical and non-technical scenarios. The LLMs' responses were evaluated regarding information quality, clarity, readability and adequacy. Of the 47 respondents, 85% were female, mean age of 50 years old, with a mean of 19 years of experience (volume of 110 assisted pregnancies monthly). Scores attributed to answers by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 were consistently higher [Overall, GPT-3.5, 3.9 (3.8-4.1); GPT-4.0, 3.9 (3.8-4.1); Custom GPT-3.5, 2.7 (2.5-2.8); Meditron-70b, 3.5 (3.3-3.6); p = 0.000]. The responses garnered high scores for clarity (Q&A-1 3.5, Q&A-2 3.7, Q&A-3 3.8) and for quality of content (Q&A-1 3.2, Q&A-2 3.2, Q&A-3 3.7); however, they differed by language. The commonest limitation to quality was incomplete content. Readability analysis indicated that responses may require high educational level for comprehension. Gender bias was detected, as models referred to healthcare professionals as males. Overall, GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 outperformed all other models. These findings highlight the potential of artificial intelligence in improving access to high-quality maternal health information. Given the complex process of generating high-quality non-English databases, it is desirable to incorporate more accurate translation tools and resourceful architectures for contextualization and customisation.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyLanguageMaternal HealthAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPakistanPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesEvaluationLarge language modelsLow- and Middle-Income countriesMaternal health education

Identifiers

PMID40593918
PMCPMC12215737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.