ArticleScientific reports2025
Systematic screening for primary immunodeficiencies in patients hospitalized for severe infection in pediatric intensive care unit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over 500 primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) have been described, but immunological assessment after a severe infection is not routine. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a PID screening protocol and calculate PID prevalence in children admitted for severe infection in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This monocentric retrospective study evaluated the feasibility of a PID monitoring protocol after severe infection in children aged 1 month to 16 years-old hospitalized in the Montpellier University Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020. Follow-up consultations at 3 and 12 months included the three main PID screening scores, comprehensive immunological and genetic screenings. Among 1125 children admitted to the PICU, 46 had severe infections and caused by bacterial (48%), viral (39%) or fungal (2%) pathogens. Before infection, none had completed any screening score recommended by dedicated societies (Jeffrey Modell Foundation, German Patients' Organization for Primary Immunodeficiencies, French Reference Center for Hereditary Immunodeficiencies). At 3 months, three patients had a PID diagnosis (6.5% prevalence, 95% CI 1.4-17.9). These were associated with a deletion of chromosomal region 22q11.21 (DiGeorge syndrome), ELANE mutation (Elastase deficiency or Severe Congenital Neutropenia 1), and C5 deficiency Forty children (87%) presented immunological anomalies without a formal PID diagnosis. These persisted in only 4/17 children tested at 12 months. The most frequent abnormalities were low NK lymphocytes (41.18%), and abnormal B lymphocyte population distribution (25%). The observed PID prevalence post-severe infection matches previous reports, even with a high rate of viral infections, often overlooked. Systematic PID investigation after severe infection, regardless of the pathogen, should be implemented to improve early detection and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.