ArticleScientific reports2025
Human and ecological health risks from heavy metal contamination in groundwater aquifers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis and Evaluation of Groundwater Pollution for Coastal Agricultural Waste Landfills.Toxics · 2026Article
- Groundwater hydrochemistry and water quality assessment in the traditional irrigation region, China.Journal of water and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Landfills are the most commonly used Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) disposal method in the world. However, poorly engineered open landfill sites pose significant environmental threats, particularly groundwater contamination from leachate infiltration. In alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), SDG 3- Good Health and well-being, Goal 6- Clean water and sanitation (SDG#5), this study conducts a comprehensive hydro-chemical assessment of twenty-four (24) groundwater samples extracted across four georeferenced zones surrounding Sialkot landfill sites, Punjab, Pakistan. A total of 22 physicochemical parameters were analyzed. Findings reveal non-compliance with Punjab Environmental Quality Standards (PEQs) and WHO drinking water guidelines. Elevated heavy metal concentrations- Chromium (Cr), Zinc (Zn), Lead (Pb), and Nickel (Ni) exceeded safe thresholds in all zones, while Cyanide (CN), Manganese (Mn), and Copper (Cu) remained within limits. Metal concentration order was observed as Mg > Zn > Cu > Fe > Pb > Cr > Mn > Ni > CN. Geo-accumulation factor and ecological risk index flagged Zone 1 as critically impacted, particularly by Cr and Ni. Fe levels remained constantly lower than 1 mgL
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.