ArticleNature communications2025
Dissecting crosstalk induced by cell-cell communication using single-cell transcriptomic data.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive PTM atlas of Dermatophagoides farinae reveals an acylation-dominated landscape of allergens.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- HNPP: Higher-order network-based personalized PageRank for detecting critical phase in complex biological systems.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Identifying potential ligand-receptor interactions by integrating LSTM network and the attention mechanism for cell-cell communication prediction.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Decoding cellular communication networks and signaling pathways in bone, skeletal muscle, and bone-muscle crosstalk through spatial transcriptomics in a young male mouse.Bone research · 2026Article
- Review
- Decoding the archipelago: single-cell biomarkers rechart the molecular geography of acute myeloid leukemia.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During cell-cell communication (CCC), pathways activated by different ligand-receptor pairs may have crosstalk with each other. While multiple methods have been developed to infer CCC networks and their downstream response using single-cell RNA-seq data (scRNA-seq), the potential crosstalk between pathways connecting CCC with its downstream targets has been ignored. Here we introduce a machine learning-based method SigXTalk to analyze the crosstalk using scRNA-seq data by quantifying signal fidelity and specificity, two critical quantities measuring the effect of crosstalk. Specifically, a hypergraph learning method is used to encode the higher-order relations among receptors, transcription factors and target genes within regulatory pathways. Benchmarking of SigXTalk using simulation and real-world data shows the effectiveness, robustness, and accuracy in identifying key shared molecules among crosstalk pathways and their roles in transferring shared CCC information. Analysis of disease data shows SigXTalk's capability in identifying crucial signals, targets, regulatory networks, and CCC patterns that distinguish different disease conditions. Applications to the data with multiple time points reveals SigXTalk's capability in tracking the evolution of crosstalk pathways over time. Together our studies provide a systematic analysis of CCC-induced regulatory networks from the perspective of crosstalk between pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.