ArticleScientific data2025
De novo transcriptome assembly of Acartia tonsa adults using Nanopore long-read sequencing.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acartia tonsa is a calanoid copepod with a cosmopolitan distribution. Its ecological relevance makes it a useful bioindicator organism for assessing the toxicity of various compounds. However, transcriptomic assemblies of A. tonsa using long-read technologies have not yet been described. The use of long-read sequencing technologies in transcriptomics allows the study of alternative splicing, structural variations and alternative polyadenylation sites. In this study, we present a de novo transcriptome of A. tonsa adult copepods exposed to different neonicotinoids obtained from Nanopore sequences. This transcriptome (261,560 total transcripts, with 31,291 representative sequences) exhibits 88.3% completeness and an N50 of 2,580 bases, showing better results than previous assemblies of the same organism. We also performed a full annotation by sequence homology (NR database), domain identification (InterProScan) and functional classification (Gene Ontology); 54.3% of representative transcripts were annotated in at least one database. Our transcriptome represents a solid baseline for further transcriptomic studies on A. tonsa and, specifically, its response to currently used pesticides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.