Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593787›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

MC-MED, multimodal clinical monitoring in the emergency department.

Aman Kansal, Emma Chen, Boyang Tom Jin, Pranav Rajpurkar, David A Kim

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. ED-Explain: Personalized Video Instructions for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aman KansalDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Emma ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Boyang Tom JinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Pranav RajpurkarDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8030-3727
David A KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA. davidak@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0151-5121

Funding

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Gordon E. and Betty I. Moore Foundation) AWD102625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency Department (ED) patients often present with undiagnosed complaints, and can exhibit rapidly evolving physiology. Therefore, data from continuous physiologic monitoring, in addition to the electronic health record, is essential to understand the acute course of illness and responses to interventions. The complexity of ED care and the large amount of unstructured multimodal data it produces have limited the accessibility of detailed ED data for research. We release Multimodal Clinical Monitoring in the Emergency Department (MC-MED), a comprehensive, multimodal, and de-identified clinical and physiological dataset. MC-MED includes 118,385 adult ED visits to an academic medical center from 2020 to 2022. Data include continuously monitored vital signs, physiologic waveforms (electrocardiogram, photoplethysmogram, respiration), patient demographics, medical histories, orders, medication administrations, laboratory and imaging results, and visit outcomes. MC-MED is the first dataset to combine detailed physiologic monitoring with clinical events and outcomes for a large, diverse ED population.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdultElectronic Health RecordsHumansMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicVital Signs

Identifiers

PMID40593787
PMCPMC12216331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.