Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593749›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Hundreds of grocery outlets needed across the United States to achieve walkable cities.

Drew Horton, Tom M Logan, Emily Speakman, Daphne Skipper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Drew HortonDepartment of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Tom M LoganDepartment of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. tom.logan@canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9209-3018
Emily SpeakmanDepartment of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7352-1355
Daphne Skipper, Annapolis, MD, USA.

Funding

University of Canterbury (UC) Cluster for Community and Urban Resilience
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The location of amenities in urban areas fundamentally shapes both sustainability and equity outcomes. While cities worldwide are pursuing walkable neighborhood initiatives, the practical implications of retrofitting existing urban areas remain unclear. How many new facilities are needed, and where should they be located to ensure equitable access? We analyzed supermarket access across 500 U.S. cities using an optimization approach that minimizes both average distance and inequality in its distribution. Unlike traditional methods that focus solely on reducing inequality or average distance, our approach identifies solutions that improve overall accessibility while reducing disparities. We found that 25% of cities could achieve 15-minute walking access by adding five or fewer stores in optimal locations, while more ambitious 5-minute targets would require over 100 additional stores in most cities. These findings demonstrate both the potential for strategic interventions to efficiently improve access and the substantial challenge posed by car-oriented urban development. By identifying priority areas for new facilities while considering distributional impacts, our method can inform multiple stakeholders working to create more sustainable and equitable cities - from local governments using zoning and incentives to state agencies developing funding programs and community organizations advocating for improved food access.

Indexed as

CommerceFood MarketsFood SupplyWalkingCitiesHumansNeighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40593749
PMCPMC12214625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.