Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593735›Full record

SynthesisNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2025

Mother-to-infant vertical transmission in early life: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of Bifidobacterium strain transmissibility.

Eduard Flores Ventura, María Esteban-Torres, Miguel Gueimonde, Douwe van Sinderen, Omry Koren, Lindsay J Hall, Nicola Segata, Mireia Valles-Colomer, Maria Carmen Collado

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Insights into toxin-antitoxin systems in the genusApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eduard Flores Ventura *Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology- National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
María Esteban-Torres *Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology- National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
Miguel Gueimonde *Department of Microbiology and Biochemistry, Dairy Research Institute- National Research Council (IPLA-CSIC), Villaviciosa, Spain.
Douwe van Sinderen *APC Microbiome Ireland and School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Omry Koren *Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
Lindsay J Hall *Department of Microbes, Infection and Microbiomes, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nicola Segata *Department CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Mireia Valles-Colomer *Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Carmen Collado *Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology- National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain. mcolam@iata.csic.es.

Funding

European Research Council 639226European Union's Horizon 2020 898088Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación CEX2021-001189-S-20-1Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación CEX2021-001189-S/ MCIN/AEI / 10.13039/501100011033Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2022-139328OA-I00Ministerio de Universidades Beatriz Galindo Junior Fellowship BG22/00172Science Foundation Ireland SFI/12/RC/2273-P1 and SFI/12/RC/2273-P2Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust Investigator 220876/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early-life colonization is a critical developmental process influencing infant biological programming, with bifidobacteria playing a key role. This systematic review examines the transmissibility of Bifidobacterium strains from mothers to infants. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 31 articles from 2009 to 2024 were selected from 2825 screened titles and abstracts. Using a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis, the review focuses on studies employing strain-level metagenomic approaches (Protocol registry CRD: CRD42023490507). Ten studies using shotgun metagenomic sequencing identified specific strains of B. adolescentis, B. angulatum, B. bifidum, B. breve, B. pseudocatenulatum, B. catenulatum, and B. longum shared between mothers and infants. A meta-analysis of 810 mother-infant pairs revealed an overall species transmissibility estimate of 30% (95% CI: 0.17; 0.44), with B. longum strains persisting in infants' guts for up to 6 months. Strain transmissibility was higher in vaginally delivered infants compared to those delivered by caesarean section. This review highlights the high transmission rates of maternal Bifidobacterium strains in early-life gut seeding, particularly B. bifidum and B. longum. Despite ongoing research, uncertainties remain regarding the precise characteristics, transmission routes, and mechanisms of transmitted strains. Comprehensive approaches, including metagenomic sequencing and longitudinal studies, are needed to understand the role of vertical transmission in infant gut microbiome engraftment and its functional implications.

Indexed as

Bifidobacteriales InfectionsBifidobacteriumInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMetagenomicsMothersPregnancyVagina

Identifiers

PMID40593735
PMCPMC12219069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.