ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2025
Time-to-event analysis mitigates the impact of symptomatic therapy on therapeutic benefit in Parkinson's disease trials.
Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PARQ: A Complexity-Consensus Aware Automatic Assessment of Motor Disease Severity in Parkinson's Disease.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of symptomatic medications represents a challenge for clinical trials of novel medicines designed to slow Parkinson's disease progression. A time-to-event (TTE) approach using a defined motor progression milestone may mitigate the confounding effect of symptomatic therapy on the Movement Disorders Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). This analysis uses prasinezumab- and placebo-treated groups from the PASADENA study to evaluate the impact of symptomatic medications on treatment effects by comparing a TTE approach to a change-from-baseline approach with and without censoring the population upon starting symptomatic therapy. While the TTE approach yielded consistent hazard ratios between censored and non-censored analyses, the estimated difference between treatment arms using the change-from-baseline approach was lower without censoring than with censoring, suggesting a potential masking of prasinezumab treatment effects by symptomatic therapy. Thus, the TTE approach may mitigate the potential confounding effect of symptomatic therapy on MDS-UPDRS Part III.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.