Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593628›Full record

SynthesisNature communications2025

Global meta-analysis shows that threatened flowering plants have higher pollination deficits.

Hanyang Lin, Yongge Yuan, Junmin Li, Joanne M Bennett, Tia-Lynn Ashman, Gerardo Arceo-Gomez, Martin Burd, Laura A Burkle, Jean H Burns, Walter Durka and 7 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hanyang LinSchool of Advanced Study, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-060X
Yongge YuanSchool of Advanced Study, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Junmin LiSchool of Advanced Study, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China. lijmtzc@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8244-0461
Joanne M BennettGulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7883-3577
Tia-Lynn AshmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-5954
Gerardo Arceo-GomezDepartment of Biological Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Martin BurdIndiana University Herbarium, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Laura A BurkleDepartment of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8413-1627
Jean H BurnsDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-9094
Walter DurkaDepartment of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6611-2246
Allan G EllisDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.
Leandro FreitasRio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4146-2514
James G RodgerDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9878-3247
Jana C VamosiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2376-0729
Marina WolowskiInstitute of Natural Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5481-1472
Jing XiaCollege of Life Sciences, South-Central Minzu University, Wuhan, China.
Tiffany M KnightGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0318-1567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most flowering plant species rely on animal pollinators to reproduce, but insufficient pollen receipt, or pollen limitation, commonly occurs and is mediated by plant traits. Pollen limitation could either exacerbate extinction threat or arise as a consequence of population and range declines in threatened plants, leading to the expectation that pollen limitation should be higher in threatened compared to non-threatened plants. To test this, we perform a meta-analysis on a global dataset of pollen limitation from 2633 pollen supplementation experiments, integrating plant threat status and thirteen reproduction and life history traits. Threatened plant species have 26% higher levels of pollen limitation than non-threatened species. This pattern is moderated by plant traits and geographic location: we find higher levels of pollen limitation for threatened compared to non-threatened species for pollinator-dependent plants and for plants found in Asia and temperate zones. Using path analysis, we find that plant traits, study region, and threat status are causally linked to pollen limitation. We suggest that plant traits such as autofertility, which strongly predict pollen limitation, should be considered in global databases on plant threat. Further, preventing pollen limitation through habitat and pollinator management is a promising path to preventing plant extinction.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesMagnoliopsidaPollinationAnimalsEcosystemExtinction, BiologicalFlowersPollenReproduction

Identifiers

PMID40593628
PMCPMC12216600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.