ArticleNature communications2025
Charting γ-secretase substrates by explainable AI.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From mechanistic modeling to AI-driven design: computational strategies for targeting the γ-secretase complex.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Conformational Flexibility of Transmembrane Helices: How it Works and Where it Matters.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Pharmacology of nivegacetor (RG6289), a potent and selective gamma secretase modulator in clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteases recognize substrates by decoding sequence information-an essential cellular process elusive when recognition motifs are absent. Here, we unravel this problem for γ-secretase, an intramembrane-cleaving protease associated with Alzheimer's disease and cancer, by developing Comparative Physicochemical Profiling (CPP), a sequence-based algorithm for identifying interpretable physicochemical features. We show that CPP deciphers a γ-secretase substrate signature with single-residue resolution, which can explain the conformational transitions observed in substrates upon γ-secretase binding. Using machine learning, we predict the entire human γ-secretase substrate scope, revealing numerous previously unknown substrates. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art protein language models, improving prediction accuracy from 60% to 90%, and achieves an 88% success rate in experimental validation. Building on these advancements, we identify pathways and diseases not linked before to γ-secretase. Generally, CPP decodes physicochemical signatures-a concept that extends beyond sequence motifs. We anticipate that our approach will be broadly applicable to diverse molecular recognition processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.