ArticleNature communications2025
A genotype-to-drug diffusion model for generation of tailored anti-cancer small molecules.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative AI in healthcare: redefining clinical practice through digital transformation.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Phenotypic AI-based design of cell-specific small molecule cytotoxics.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- Target discovery and drug design in the era of artificial intelligence.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based screening of phytochemicals for targeted cancer therapy.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in breast cancer: applications and advancements.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for precision oncology from phenotyping and drug discovery to clinical translation.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Beyond apoptosis: harnessing natural products to target alternative regulated cell death for overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A genotype-to-drug diffusion model for generation of tailored anti-cancer small molecules.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in precision oncology, developing effective cancer therapeutics remains a significant challenge due to tumor heterogeneity and the limited availability of well-defined drug targets. Recent progress in generative artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising opportunity to address this challenge by enabling the design of hit-like anti-cancer molecules conditioned on complex genomic features. We present Genotype-to-Drug Diffusion (G2D-Diff), a generative AI approach for creating small molecule-based drug structures tailored to specific cancer genotypes. G2D-Diff demonstrates exceptional performance in generating diverse, drug-like compounds that meet desired efficacy conditions for a given genotype. The model outperforms existing methods in diversity, feasibility, and condition fitness. G2D-Diff learns directly from drug response data distributions, ensuring reliable candidate generation without separate predictors. Its attention mechanism provides insights into potential cancer targets and pathways, enhancing interpretability. In triple-negative breast cancer case studies, G2D-Diff generated plausible hit-like candidates by focusing on relevant pathways. By combining realistic hit-like molecule generation with relevant pathway suggestions for specific genotypes, G2D-Diff represents a significant advance in AI-guided, personalized drug discovery. This approach has the potential to accelerate drug development for challenging cancers by streamlining hit identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.