ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Rapid Mapping of Protein Binding Sites and Conformational Epitopes by Coupling Yeast Surface Display to Chemical Labeling and Deep Sequencing.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delineating the precise regions on an antigen that are targeted by antibodies is important for the development of vaccines and antibody therapeutics. X-ray crystallography and NMR are considered the gold standard for providing precise information about these binding sites at atomic resolution. However, these are labor-intensive and require purified protein at high concentrations. We have recently described (Najar TA, Khare S, Pandey R, Structure 25:395-406, 2017) a rapid and reliable method that overcomes these constraints, using a panel of single cysteine mutants of the protein of interest, and now providing protocols to facilitate its adoption. Mutants are displayed on the yeast cell surface either individually or as a pool, and labeled covalently with a cysteine-specific probe. Binding site residues are inferred by monitoring loss of ligand or antibody binding by flow cytometry coupled to deep sequencing of sorted populations, or Sanger sequencing of individual clones. Buried cysteine residues are not labeled and library sizes are small, facilitating rapid identification of binding-site residues. The methodology was used to identify epitopes on the bacterial toxin CcdB targeted by 24 different monoclonal antibodies as well as by polyclonal sera. The method does not require purified protein or protein structural information and can be applied to a variety of display formats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40593416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.