ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025
Stimulus-specific influence of gender on mental-rotation-related brain activity.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental rotation performance after acute stress.BMC psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental rotation (MR) is a cognitive process during which individuals mentally simulate the rotation in space of an object's image (stimulus). The traditional assertion that men outperform women in MR tasks may be influenced by methodological biases, such as treating gender as a secondary or post hoc variable, and relying solely on binary comparisons between two classes of MR stimuli. Furthermore, a comprehensive understanding of how nuanced the effects of the interaction between gender and stimulus type are on MR-related brain activity remains lacking. To fill these gaps, we recorded functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data while 57 participants (29 women, aged 18-35 years) performed MR of abstract objects, human bodies, and real objects. Whole-brain fMRI data analyses indicated that, with respect to women, men had larger activations in inferior frontal regions during MR of abstract objects, and in superior and medial frontal regions during MR of human bodies. Compared with men, in women we found larger activity in the superior parietal lobe during MR of human bodies with respect to abstract objects, and in the inferior occipital cortex in the MR of real objects versus human bodies. Finally, while in men we found a positive correlation between MR accuracy and brain activity in the precuneus, in women the correlation between MR accuracy and activity in motor and premotor areas was negative. These results indicate that brain activity during MR is modulated by the type of stimulus, differently for women and men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.