ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
A simplified method for generating maximum slope maps in ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical measurement of the maximum slope (MS) using ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced (UF-DCE) breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is typically performed by placing a region of interest (ROI) in the most enhanced area within a lesion. However, previous studies have not clarified whether visually identified enhanced areas consistently exhibit the highest MS values. These ROI-based MS measurements require MS maps to ensure appropriate ROI placement. However, generating MS maps requires specialized software capable of pixel-by-pixel MS calculations, which are available only at a few facilities. Therefore, this study proposed a simplified method for generating MS maps. This method involves subtracting consecutive UF-DCE images, applying temporal maximum intensity projection, normalizing the resulting image by dividing it by the pre-contrast image signal intensity, and converting it to a slope by dividing it by the temporal resolution. The MS maps generated using the proposed method were compared with those obtained using a robust pixel-by-pixel curve-fitting method, in addition to the final-phase UF-DCE images. In all cases with breast lesions (n = 13), the signal intensity distributions on the proposed MS maps closely resembled those on the curve-fitting maps, with a significantly higher similarity than those on the final-phase UF-DCE images (p < 0.001). The derived mean absolute error of MS values after regression-based modification was 0.78 ± 0.72 (%/s). The proposed method improves the reliability of ROI placement in conventional ROI-based MS measurements and supports the direct quantification of MS values from map pixel data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40593389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.