ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Capitalisation as a boundary object in intervention research, serving knowledge production and mobilisation.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge transfer is a key issue in population health intervention research (PHIR). In order to foster ownership and implementation of evidence-based data by decision-makers and field workers, it is important to produce more knowledge based on the actual practices of these actors. By providing a platform for field actors and mobilising a structured, qualitative approach to collect, analyse, and share field-based knowledge, Capitalisation of Experience Knowledge in Health Promotion (CEKHP) can be a valuable tool for PHIR. This article illustrates this contribution through two concrete experiences of mobilising the CEKHP approach within the framework of two projects: the PROSCeSS PHIR project (health promotion within sports clubs) and the IMPACT project (transferability analysis of the experimental primary care system for disadvantaged patients).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.