ArticleScientific reports2025
A targeted next-generation sequencing panel for identification of clinically relevant mutation profiles in solid tumours.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Next-Generation Sequencing and Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Adult-Onset Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis: Challenges in Interpreting Variants of Uncertain Significance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pan-Cancer Targeted Sequencing Reveals Genomic Heterogeneity and Prognostic Subgroups in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) using multigene panels has become an effective tool for comprehensive genomic analysis in cancer, overcoming limitations of single gene assays. Nonetheless, outsourcing these assays to external laboratories and the extended turnaround time (~ 3 weeks) required for obtaining results may impede timely clinical management of cancer patients. We developed an oncopanel targeting 61 cancer-associated genes and validated its efficacy by performing NGS on 43 unique samples including clinical tissues, external quality assessment samples, and reference controls. The assay detected 794 mutations including all 92 known variants from orthogonal methods. Overall performance measures of the assay showed 99.99% repeatability and 99.98% reproducibility. Likewise, sensitivity to detect unique variants was 98.23%, with specificity at 99.99%, precision at 97.14% and accuracy at 99.99% all at 95% CI. Notably, clinically actionable mutations were observed in key genes such as KRAS, EGFR, ERBB2, PIK3CA, TP53 and BRCA1. The average turnaround time from sample processing to results was reduced to 4 days. These findings demonstrate a sensitive, high throughput oncopanel that is suitable for use in routine clinical testing. The shorter turnaround time of the assay has the potential to significantly improve patient care by facilitating more timely and personalized clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.