ArticleJournal of hematopathology2025
Evaluation of CD200 marker variations and its correlation with clinicopathological features of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients: a case-control study.
Article in Journal of hematopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given its strong correlation with disease progression and risk stratification, CD200 has emerged as a pivotal biomarker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Elevated CD200 expression, strongly linked to CLL progression, underscores its diagnostic and therapeutic potential. In this case-control study, we evaluated CD200 expression levels in CLL patients and analyzed their correlation with key clinicopathological features, investigating its potential as a critical biomarker for diagnosis and follow-up strategies. Peripheral blood samples from 27 CLL patients and five healthy individuals were stained by fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against CD19 and CD200 markers, followed by flow cytometry. Data analysis compared CD200 expression levels among CLL patients at four stages and in the healthy control group. CD200 expression levels in CLL patients' lymphocytes significantly exceeded those observed in the healthy control group (P < 0.0001). Within the patient group, expression levels progressively increased from low-risk to high-risk classifications, with statistically significant differences between each category (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, a strong positive association was identified between CD200 expression and disease clinical stage (r = 0.758, P < 0.0001), WBC count (r = 0.705, P < 0.0001), and lymphocyte percentage (r = 0.544, P = 0.009). Conversely, a strong inverse correlation was observed with neutrophil count (r = - 0.55, P = 0.008). Overall, CD200 assessment may serve as a valuable prognostic marker in CLL, providing insight into disease progression and aiding in treatment monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40593283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.