ArticleScientific reports2025
Tracking 35 years of progress in metallic materials for extreme environments via text mining.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As global energy demands rise, the advancement of new energy technologies increasingly relies on the development of metals that can endure extreme pressures, temperatures, and fluxes of energetic particles and photons, as well as aggressive chemical reactions. One way to assist in the design and manufacturing of metals for the future is by learning from their past. Here we track the progress of metallic materials for extreme environments in the past 35 years using the text mining method, which allows us to discover patterns from a large scale of literature in the field. Specifically, we leverage transfer learning and dynamic word embeddings. Approximately one million relevant abstracts ranging from 1989 to 2023 were collected from the Web of Science. The literature was then mapped to a 200-dimensional vector space, generating time-series word embeddings across six time periods. Subsequent orthogonal Procrustes analysis was employed to align and compare vectors across these periods, overcoming challenges posed by training randomness and the non-uniqueness of singular value decomposition. This enabled the comparison of the semantic evolution of terms related to metals under extreme conditions. The model's performance was evaluated using inputs categorized into materials, properties, and applications, demonstrating its ability to identify relevant metallic materials to the three input categories. The study also revealed the temporal changes in keyword associations, indicating shifts in research focus or industrial interest towards high-performance alloys for applications in aerospace and biomedical engineering, among others. This showcases the model's capability to track the progress in metallic materials for extreme environments over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.