Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593268›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The data visualization and intelligent text analysis for effective evaluation of English language teaching.

Zihe Wu, Ye Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zihe WuFaculty of Education, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ye ZhangFaculty of Education, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. s2150446@siswa.um.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to explore and construct an evaluation system of English language teaching effect combining data visualization analysis and intelligent text analysis technology. The study is based on the limitations of traditional English teaching evaluation methods, that is, relying too much on teachers' subjective judgment and lacking real-time monitoring, which cannot meet the needs of personalized teaching. In this study, data visualization technology is used to transform students' learning data into intuitive charts, and intelligent text analysis technology is used to deeply explore students' writing and oral performance in order to achieve accurate teaching decisions. The research methods include emotion analysis with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model, theme modeling with Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model, semantic analysis with Word2Vec model, and model optimization with ensemble learning methods such as Bagging, XGBoost and Stacking. The experimental results show that the accuracy of Stacking model in training set and testing set is 95.0% and 94.3% respectively, which is significantly better than other single models. In addition, the optimization model combining BERT, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and self-attention mechanism also shows significant advantages in emotional analysis and teaching content analysis. This study not only provides a new idea for the development of educational evaluation methods, but also a powerful tool for realizing personalized and accurate teaching.

Indexed as

Data VisualizationLanguageTeachingHumansLearningNeural Networks, ComputerStudentsData visualization analysisEffect evaluationEnglish language teachingEnsemble learningIntelligent text analysis

Identifiers

PMID40593268
PMCPMC12217217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.