ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Benzo[a]pyrene and UV light co-exposure: differential effects on oxidative stress and genotoxicity in human keratinocytes and ex vivo skin.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Shared Mechanisms of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Urogenital Tumors.Biology · 2026Article
- Ambient particulate-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures and gastrointestinal disease prevalence in China: a population-based cross-sectional study.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2026Article
- Glutaminolysis impairment and immunometabolic dysregulation in U937 cells: Key mechanisms in occupational and environmental skin exposure to UV and benzo[a]pyrene.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human skin exposure to environmental/occupational UV irradiation and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is a concern. This study investigated the impact of the combined exposure on metabolism, cytotoxicity/viability, oxidative stress, and genotoxicity in human skin models. To understand the dose-response relationship, we exposed our models to a range of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) concentrations. For the combined exposure scenario, the models were treated with B[a]P followed by UV irradiation. Furthermore, we employed two in vitro models: human keratinocytes and human skin explants. This allowed us to assess potential model-dependent variations in the observed toxicological effects. Keratinocytes displayed a partially synergistic response in most measured parameters at 0.4 µM B[a]P or higher after combined exposure. The comet assay identified significant DNA damage solely due to UV irradiation, and this damage was not further increased by combined exposure. Conversely, H2AX phosphorylation showed a dose-dependent increase in response to the combined exposure. Human skin explants displayed minimal changes in oxidative stress markers compared to keratinocytes. Additionally, DNA damage in explants was significantly reduced following UV irradiation alone and remained lower than after single B[a]P exposure, even with combined exposure. These findings suggest a potential UV-induced protective mechanism in ex vivo human skin under these conditions. Furthermore, they highlight the differential response of the models, with explants exhibiting lower reactivity due to their inherent complexity and robustness, potentially reflecting the protective mechanisms present in live skin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.