ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a transformer model-based early warning score for real-time prediction of adverse outcomes in the emergency department.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine critical care.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a transformer-based early warning score (TEWS) system for predicting adverse events (AEs) in the emergency department (ED). We conducted a retrospective study analyzing adult ED visits at a tertiary hospital. The TEWS was developed to predict five AEs within 24 h: vasopressor use, respiratory support, intensive care unit admission, septic shock, and cardiac arrest. Performance was evaluated and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and bootstrap-based t-test. External validation was performed using the Marketplace for Medical Information in Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV-ED database. Transfer learning was applied using 1% and 5% of the external data. A total of 414,748 patients was analyzed in the development cohort (AEs, 3.7%), and 410,880 patients (AEs, 6.7%) were included in the external validation cohort. Compared to the modified early warning score (MEWS), the TEWS incorporating 13 variables and the vital signs-only TEWS demonstrated superior prognostic performance across all AEs. The AUROC ranged from 0.833 to 0.936 for TEWS and 0.688 to 0.874 for MEWS. In external validation, the TEWS also showed acceptable discrimination with AUROC values of 0.759 to 0.905. Transfer learning significantly improved the performance, increasing AUROC values to 0.846-0.911. The TEWS system was successfully integrated into the electronic health record (EHR) system of the study hospital, providing real-time risk assessment for ED patients. We developed and validated an artificial intelligence-based early warning score system that predicts multiple adverse outcomes in the ED and was successfully integrated into the EHR system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.