ReviewNeurosurgical review2025
Evaluating artificial intelligence models for rupture risk prediction in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a focus on vessel geometry and hemodynamic insights.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI-integrated smartwatch monitoring for early detection of stroke and hemorrhage: A systematic review.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in neurovascular surgery: advancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Plant MicroRNA Research: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Integrating Laplace's law with patient-specific hemodynamics to predict rupture risk in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review of a biophysical and computational framework.Surgery in practice and science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The estimation of rupture risk in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (UIA) constitutes a major area of clinical interest due to the significant morbidity and mortality rates associated with aneurysm rupture. Classic clinical models based on factors such as size and location have demonstrated limited predictive accuracy, with small aneurysms being capable of rupture and larger ones remaining stable. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) now allow the development of more sophisticated models that integrate both geometric and hemodynamic variables, including wall shear stress (WSS) and blood flow dynamics. While previous studies have examined these factors separately, our review specifically focuses on how they are combined within AI-based predictive models for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). This integrated approach offers a more comprehensive and patient-specific risk assessment, going beyond traditional size-based methods. A wide array of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) using SVMs (Support Vector Machine) and CNNs (Convolutional Neural Network) has demonstrated much better predictive accuracy than those attained by classical methods. Minimum necessary hemodynamic parameters including WSS and oscillatory shear index (OSI) were identified as critical indicators of rupture. Moreover, the review emphasized how CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) merged with AI in simulating patient-specific hemodynamics, outstanding progress having been achieved in the realm of risk assessment. Currently, there are promising developments in AI models for clinical practice, but large and good-quality datasets, along with interpretation of model predictions, remain challenges. More research would further refine these models toward improvement, with increased utility in a clinical setup to better aim at patient-specific risk assessment and optimization of treatment strategies for UIAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40593222What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.