Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593222›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2025

Evaluating artificial intelligence models for rupture risk prediction in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a focus on vessel geometry and hemodynamic insights.

Muhammad Mohsin Khan, Noman Shah, Javed Iqbal, Nasser M F El-Ghandour, Miroslav Vukic, Michael Lawton, Jacques J Morcos, Bostjan Matos, Najia El-Abbadi, Amir Samii and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Muhammad Mohsin KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Noman ShahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Javed IqbalCDC, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Nasser M F El-GhandourDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Miroslav VukicDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical School, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Michael LawtonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Arizona, USA.
Jacques J MorcosDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Bostjan MatosDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Najia El-AbbadiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ibn Sina Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Amir SamiiDepartment of Neurosurgery, International Neuroscience Institute, Hannover, Germany.
Eberval Gadelha FigueiredoDivision of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Franco ServadeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Ahmed AlAzriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Khoula Hospital, Khoula, Oman.
Kodeeswaran MDepartment of Neurosurgery, Government Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai, India.
Aruni VelalakanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Vneuro Clinic, Sigmaringen, Germany.
Bipin ChaurasiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal. trozexa@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The estimation of rupture risk in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (UIA) constitutes a major area of clinical interest due to the significant morbidity and mortality rates associated with aneurysm rupture. Classic clinical models based on factors such as size and location have demonstrated limited predictive accuracy, with small aneurysms being capable of rupture and larger ones remaining stable. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) now allow the development of more sophisticated models that integrate both geometric and hemodynamic variables, including wall shear stress (WSS) and blood flow dynamics. While previous studies have examined these factors separately, our review specifically focuses on how they are combined within AI-based predictive models for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). This integrated approach offers a more comprehensive and patient-specific risk assessment, going beyond traditional size-based methods. A wide array of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) using SVMs (Support Vector Machine) and CNNs (Convolutional Neural Network) has demonstrated much better predictive accuracy than those attained by classical methods. Minimum necessary hemodynamic parameters including WSS and oscillatory shear index (OSI) were identified as critical indicators of rupture. Moreover, the review emphasized how CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) merged with AI in simulating patient-specific hemodynamics, outstanding progress having been achieved in the realm of risk assessment. Currently, there are promising developments in AI models for clinical practice, but large and good-quality datasets, along with interpretation of model predictions, remain challenges. More research would further refine these models toward improvement, with increased utility in a clinical setup to better aim at patient-specific risk assessment and optimization of treatment strategies for UIAs.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedArtificial IntelligenceHemodynamicsIntracranial AneurysmHumansRisk AssessmentArtificial intelligenceComputational fluid dynamicsHemodynamicsIntracranial aneurysmsMachine learningRupture riskVessel geometry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.