ArticleScientific reports2025
Macular microvasculature asymmetry in high myopia patients with early open-angle glaucoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness of vertical asymmetry analysis of the macular microvasculature in high myopia patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Participants were divided into two groups: those with high myopia (group 1) and those with both high myopia and OAG (group 2). Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, vessel density (VD), and the absolute vertical difference of RNFL thickness (vdRNFL) and VD (vdVD) were compared. A logistic regression analysis determined the factors associated with OAG, and diagnostic accuracy was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). Mean RNFL thickness was 91.2 ± 11.5 and 78.2 ± 13.0 μm (P < 0.001) and the VD of the full area was 17.5 ± 1.9 and 16.6 ± 2.4 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.